<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pretend Primary:  Diebold strikes again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/</link>
	<description>Bill Noxid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Revolutionary Organization &#187; Archive &#187; Clinton Comeback: Courtesy of Diebold</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>A Revolutionary Organization &#187; Archive &#187; Clinton Comeback: Courtesy of Diebold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>[...] difficult to find any measure of truth. In my last writing on Diebold ( which I suggest you read ), the fact that so many hand-counted districts were right next to Accuvote districts made the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] difficult to find any measure of truth. In my last writing on Diebold ( which I suggest you read ), the fact that so many hand-counted districts were right next to Accuvote districts made the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddie</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>Just a thuoght...

Don&#039;t the polling orgs keep a district by district breakdown of exit polls?

And another...

Would a FOI request get it out of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a thuoght&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t the polling orgs keep a district by district breakdown of exit polls?</p>
<p>And another&#8230;</p>
<p>Would a FOI request get it out of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Jesus, Mary, and Joseph that was a LONG post but I like your content, and in the spirit of b.a.d and my genuine interest in your blog, I shall add you to my roll and now whore my own:

shatteredsoapbox.blogspot.com

g&#039;day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, Mary, and Joseph that was a LONG post but I like your content, and in the spirit of b.a.d and my genuine interest in your blog, I shall add you to my roll and now whore my own:</p>
<p>shatteredsoapbox.blogspot.com</p>
<p>g&#8217;day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawna</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Thank you for trying to bring this out into the open.  I&#039;m a bit of a math nerd and, once I heard the rumors, did some calculations on the raw data as well.  The results both shocked and scared me!!

Here are two questions I have. First, I don&#039;t believe that the Clintons personally decided to hack into the machines. What is more likely to me is that there is a computer glitch OR that someone that stands to gain from a Clinton nominee did hack into the system. Could we did deeper for a connection?

My main question -- How do we get this into the media forefront??  I have emailed and called and I am concerned with the lack of coverage on this story.  This should be HUGE news and yet most people don&#039;t know it exists.  Any ideas on how we can start a movement for coverage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for trying to bring this out into the open.  I&#8217;m a bit of a math nerd and, once I heard the rumors, did some calculations on the raw data as well.  The results both shocked and scared me!!</p>
<p>Here are two questions I have. First, I don&#8217;t believe that the Clintons personally decided to hack into the machines. What is more likely to me is that there is a computer glitch OR that someone that stands to gain from a Clinton nominee did hack into the system. Could we did deeper for a connection?</p>
<p>My main question &#8212; How do we get this into the media forefront??  I have emailed and called and I am concerned with the lack of coverage on this story.  This should be HUGE news and yet most people don&#8217;t know it exists.  Any ideas on how we can start a movement for coverage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recount? &#171; Civic Alert</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Recount? &#171; Civic Alert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>[...] Kucinich Seeks NH Dem Vote Recount - [AP] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kucinich Seeks NH Dem Vote Recount &#8211; [AP] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sophia</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>sophia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Make that Alex Jones 
Sorry Alex I&#039;m worn out researching all this stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make that Alex Jones<br />
Sorry Alex I&#8217;m worn out researching all this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sophia</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>sophia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>Aw Shucks folks just go to Prisonplanet.com and see what Art Jones has uncovered.
For all you Ron Paul fans they did not even count the 31 votes they say he got. The first result said 0 then after checking opps there were 31 of those pesky votes for Dr. Paul.
Time to wake up AMERICA and claim your birthright to be free.
Birth of a new nation 
Birth is always Messy.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw Shucks folks just go to Prisonplanet.com and see what Art Jones has uncovered.<br />
For all you Ron Paul fans they did not even count the 31 votes they say he got. The first result said 0 then after checking opps there were 31 of those pesky votes for Dr. Paul.<br />
Time to wake up AMERICA and claim your birthright to be free.<br />
Birth of a new nation<br />
Birth is always Messy&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>One reason I hope Obama wins the nomination is that he seems to be the most difficult candidate for any Republican to beat. It would be to their advantage to interfere with his nomination.

This wouldn&#039;t be the first time I have seen this. Being from Florida, I was dismayed when (following from Wikipedia):

&quot;Reno ran for Governor of Florida in 2002, but lost in the Democratic primary to Bill McBride. Voting problems arose in the election, and she did not concede defeat until a week later.[9]&quot; 

Reno had incredible name recognition as the first female Attorney General (3/11/93 - 1/20/2001) but she &quot;lost&quot; the nomination to the relatively unknown Bill McBride. Jeb then &quot;won&quot; re-election as Governor. 

This is first thing I thought about when the polls again were &quot;wrong.&quot; Then, when I saw the YouTube video from Black Box Voting and read about John Silvestro and LHS Associates &quot;counting&quot; 81% of the votes in N.H., it confirmed my doubts of yet another unfair election.

Polls did seem to have accurately accounted for Republicans in N.H. and for all of Iowa. The only discrepancy was Obama/Clinton.

Funny how before the bush administration, polls always seemed reliable. bush even claimed Ukrainian election must have been rigged because the voting results did not match the presumedly accurate polls.

Now, each surprise favors Republicans. How strange...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One reason I hope Obama wins the nomination is that he seems to be the most difficult candidate for any Republican to beat. It would be to their advantage to interfere with his nomination.</p>
<p>This wouldn&#8217;t be the first time I have seen this. Being from Florida, I was dismayed when (following from Wikipedia):</p>
<p>&#8220;Reno ran for Governor of Florida in 2002, but lost in the Democratic primary to Bill McBride. Voting problems arose in the election, and she did not concede defeat until a week later.[9]&#8221; </p>
<p>Reno had incredible name recognition as the first female Attorney General (3/11/93 &#8211; 1/20/2001) but she &#8220;lost&#8221; the nomination to the relatively unknown Bill McBride. Jeb then &#8220;won&#8221; re-election as Governor. </p>
<p>This is first thing I thought about when the polls again were &#8220;wrong.&#8221; Then, when I saw the YouTube video from Black Box Voting and read about John Silvestro and LHS Associates &#8220;counting&#8221; 81% of the votes in N.H., it confirmed my doubts of yet another unfair election.</p>
<p>Polls did seem to have accurately accounted for Republicans in N.H. and for all of Iowa. The only discrepancy was Obama/Clinton.</p>
<p>Funny how before the bush administration, polls always seemed reliable. bush even claimed Ukrainian election must have been rigged because the voting results did not match the presumedly accurate polls.</p>
<p>Now, each surprise favors Republicans. How strange&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>To add a little more fuel to the fire, in Iowa Obama won in the urban/suburban areas.  Clinton did best in the very northern and western counties.  I pretty sure these are the  least populous counties in Iowa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add a little more fuel to the fire, in Iowa Obama won in the urban/suburban areas.  Clinton did best in the very northern and western counties.  I pretty sure these are the  least populous counties in Iowa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billnoxid.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/pretend-primary-diebold-strikes-again-2/#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the data. I too looked at it and I don&#039;t trust the &quot;Diebold Factor&quot; either. 

However, I must say this... I live in central NH and I volunteered in our small town to work on the voter checklist and to count votes on Tuesday evening. I&#039;ve been doing this for over 15 years now, so you can see the trends happening as you start counting the votes. 

Turnout was huge... we had almost 200 new voter registrations this week. Many, of them young people, but &#039;lot&#039;s&#039; of women, young and old. About 1,700 votes were cast in our town, so new voters made up about 10%-12% of the total. (Note: These people never got &#039;polled&#039; in the lead up to the primary because they are &#039;not&#039; on the voter checklist prior to election day.) 

My counting partner and I counted 201 of the democratic (paper) ballots after the polls closed. I was hoping Obama would win, but the Clinton votes kept adding up. 

At the end of the counting Clinton had 80 out of the 201 votes we hand counted... Obama had 63. That&#039;s  40% to 32% in our small sampling. This &#039;trend&#039; was pretty darn close to the final results. 

925 Democratic ballots were cast in our town... Clinton got 37%, Obama 32%, Edwards 22%, and others got the rest. 

As much as I&#039;d like to blame it all on Diebold... and I don&#039;t trust those machines for a minute... she beat him fair and square  in our small town. 

One other thing... if you look at the town by town results... look for Hanover &amp; Lebanon (Dartmouth), Plymouth... (Plymouth State Univ), Durham (UNH), Henniker (N.E. College), New London (Colby Coll.) and Keene (Keene State College). 

Obama carried those towns easily, but he didn&#039;t do well in the mill towns like Berlin, Gorham, Franklin and other traditional blue collar communities. 

The Obama kids were &#039;jumpin,&#039; came to my house several times. My guess...they were dyin&#039; to fill out every survey and poll they could find! 

Working Moms? Survey? Poll? &quot;Sorry young fella...I just got out of work...I barely had time to vote...I&#039;ve gotta get home and cook dinner, clean the house and get the kids ready for bed... no time for a silly exit poll.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the data. I too looked at it and I don&#8217;t trust the &#8220;Diebold Factor&#8221; either. </p>
<p>However, I must say this&#8230; I live in central NH and I volunteered in our small town to work on the voter checklist and to count votes on Tuesday evening. I&#8217;ve been doing this for over 15 years now, so you can see the trends happening as you start counting the votes. </p>
<p>Turnout was huge&#8230; we had almost 200 new voter registrations this week. Many, of them young people, but &#8216;lot&#8217;s&#8217; of women, young and old. About 1,700 votes were cast in our town, so new voters made up about 10%-12% of the total. (Note: These people never got &#8216;polled&#8217; in the lead up to the primary because they are &#8216;not&#8217; on the voter checklist prior to election day.) </p>
<p>My counting partner and I counted 201 of the democratic (paper) ballots after the polls closed. I was hoping Obama would win, but the Clinton votes kept adding up. </p>
<p>At the end of the counting Clinton had 80 out of the 201 votes we hand counted&#8230; Obama had 63. That&#8217;s  40% to 32% in our small sampling. This &#8216;trend&#8217; was pretty darn close to the final results. </p>
<p>925 Democratic ballots were cast in our town&#8230; Clinton got 37%, Obama 32%, Edwards 22%, and others got the rest. </p>
<p>As much as I&#8217;d like to blame it all on Diebold&#8230; and I don&#8217;t trust those machines for a minute&#8230; she beat him fair and square  in our small town. </p>
<p>One other thing&#8230; if you look at the town by town results&#8230; look for Hanover &amp; Lebanon (Dartmouth), Plymouth&#8230; (Plymouth State Univ), Durham (UNH), Henniker (N.E. College), New London (Colby Coll.) and Keene (Keene State College). </p>
<p>Obama carried those towns easily, but he didn&#8217;t do well in the mill towns like Berlin, Gorham, Franklin and other traditional blue collar communities. </p>
<p>The Obama kids were &#8216;jumpin,&#8217; came to my house several times. My guess&#8230;they were dyin&#8217; to fill out every survey and poll they could find! </p>
<p>Working Moms? Survey? Poll? &#8220;Sorry young fella&#8230;I just got out of work&#8230;I barely had time to vote&#8230;I&#8217;ve gotta get home and cook dinner, clean the house and get the kids ready for bed&#8230; no time for a silly exit poll.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
